After reading some other blog posts and listening to the discussions in class, I agree with other people in how cynical and ironic Doctorow ends the story. In Mr. Mitchell’s blog post “A Happy Ending?”, I remember him saying the following quote: “history does not produce tidy narratives with clear morals or meanings”. We create history in order to record our past accomplishments and failures. This history is used to look back and try to learn something about ourselves from it. However, not every single event can be recorded and, as I have already discussed in my previous blog post, we fill in the holes with our own theories and fictional thoughts. At the same time, history is not some fairy tale that we can take too kindly, for there is always war, massacres, and tragedies in every generation’s history. People with the insanity of those like Harry K. Thaw have played significant roles in history, everyone from dictators to revolutionaries. Whether we like them or not, they will continue to exist in the future forever.
If I had to describe the biggest thing I learned from Ragtime,
it’s how an author of historical fiction can practically do whatever
they want with real historical figures. As we’ve probably talked about
over and over again, Doctorow has created these ridiculous and ludicrous
back stories behind J.P. Morgan, Ford, and Houdini. Yet, nobody can
prove Doctorow wrong because there is no solid evidence to do so. The
author has the power to create his own world with these real events and
historical figures whether they be true or not.
After reading the first day’s reading of Mumbo Jumbo,
I can see, as Mr. Mitchell has already said before, how different
Reed’s take is as a historical fiction author. I don’t want to say much
about Mumbo Jumbo yet, as I have not read too deeply into it. However, Ragtime has
certainly opened my eyes in how I view historical fiction novels, and
hopefully I’ll learn something even bigger in our next book.
No comments:
Post a Comment